Institute of Linguistics, Adam Mickiewicz University

Investigationes Linguisticae

  Bulletin devoted to general, comparative and applied linguistics

  Selected: Vol. XIII, 2006
  Table of Contents
  Full Papers
  Reports, Abstracts etc.
  Student Papers
  Varia Linguisticae

  General Information
  Lista recenzent├│w
  Guidelines for Authors
  Editoral Committee
  CL-A 2010 - Instructions

  Archive (electronic)
 Volume XXX - 2014 (new)
 Volume XXIX - 2013
 Volume XXVIII - 2013
 Volume XXVII - 2012
 Volume XXVI - 2012
 Volume XXV - 2012
 Volume XXIV - 2011
 Volume XXIII - 2011
 Volume XXII - 2010
 Volume XXI - 2010
 Volume XX - 2010
 Volume XIX - 2010
 Volume XVIII - 2009
 Volume XVII - 2009
 Volume XVI - 2008
 Volume XV - 2007
 Volume XIV - 2006
 Volume XIII - 2006
 Volume XII - 2005
 Volume XI - 2004
 Volume X - 2004
 Volume IX - 2003
 Volume VIII - 2002
 Volume - 0000

  Archive (printed)
 Volume VII - 1999
 Volume VI - 1999
 Volume V - 1999
 Volume IV - 1998
 Volume III - 1998
 Volume II - 1997
 Volume I - 1995
Volume XIII, 2006
Table of Contents

The Logical Discipline of Normative Argumentation
Some considerations on the axiological status of speech acts
Jan Wawrzyniak (Instytut J─Özykoznawstwa, Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza)

Download document

Other articles by this author | Add to Quick Links

Source: Investigationes Linguisticae, Volume XIII, 2006, pp. 196-205
Category: Full Papers

Language: English

English Abstract:

This paper is intended to promote a way of is-ought derivation, rooted in neonaturalistic solutions which were worked out within the scope of both the ontology of values and metaethical applications of 20th Century linguistic philosophy. Normative, especially in the sphere of morality, reasoning is supposed to be the most significant component of the structure of social communication. The common practices of normative persuasion employ a variety of modes of argumentation such as the usage of evaluations, norms, imperatives, performative utterances, prescriptions, optatives. There is a wide range of kinds of emotive pressure performed by speech acts, behind which some intentions of perlocutionary effects are hidden, and which all have methodologically differentiated status. Therefore, the ability to recognize some tricks employed in such practices as well as the qualified faculty of argumentation for and validation of one's own moral convictions seems to be an indispensable component of a subject's high cultural competency. The moral responsibility for social states-of-affairs generated by speech acts requires such competency. The neonaturalistic approach - itself representing cognitive meta-ethics and recognizing the pragmatic functions of speech acts as a social phenomenon - proposes a philosophical alternative to the cage of formalized languages of normative reasoning (like various systems of deontic logic) in order to find real, verifiable - not necessarily of contractual origin - value-referred premises for the inference of socially applied judgments of duty. The distinction between logical validation and moral (value-referred) justification of imperatives is emphasized at the same time. On this account certain philosophical interpretations of the categories of "fact", "value" and "personal agent of valuation and cognition" is carried out and an example of is-ought inference is presented.

BibTeX Entry:

@article{ Jan_Wawrzyniak_INVE13,
 author="Jan Wawrzyniak",
 title= "The Logical Discipline of Normative Argumentation",
 journal="Investigationes Linguisticae",
 url="" }
Quick Search
  Search in
  Results per page

Quick Links
No articles have been added to Quick Links. Use "Add to Quick Links" in the article details.

Get Acrobat Reader
Get Ghostscript
Copyright © Institute of Linguistics, Adam Mickiewicz University
Design and programming by Marcin Junczys-Dowmunt